Tradition and Change in Administrative Law [electronic resource] : An Anglo-German Comparison / by Martina Künnecke.

By: Künnecke, Martina [author.]Contributor(s): SpringerLink (Online service)Material type: TextTextPublisher: Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2007Description: XII, 266 p. online resourceContent type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9783540486893Subject(s): Law | Private international law | Conflict of laws | International law | Comparative law | Public international law | Law | Public International Law | Private International Law, International & Foreign Law, Comparative LawAdditional physical formats: Printed edition:: No titleDDC classification: 341 LOC classification: K3150Online resources: Click here to access online
Contents:
The development of judicial review of administrative action -- Judicial review of discretionary powers -- Procedural errors in the administrative procedure -- Governmental liability -- Tradition and change.
In: Springer eBooksSummary: Administrative legal systems are based on national constitutional legal traditions and cultural values. English judges have for centuries applied the common law. In Germany, judges have developed administrative legal principles for the protection of the individual against state action. However, over the last few decades’ Administrative legal systems have become less isolated. This is the result of fundamental developments in the European legal landscape and of the increasing complexity of Administrative legal problems. In the UK, the constitutional basis for judicial review, principles of judicial control and governmental liability as well as the organisation of the courts are changing. Both, the English and the German Administrative legal systems are increasingly faced with the question of how to balance the dynamics of change with the preserving forces of tradition. Here, the open attitude of judges and lawmakers in considering solutions offered elsewhere is a remarkable development in a field of law which has long been perceived as too nationally specific. There is a growing need for comparative material and analysis in Administrative law - this book provides a valuable contribution to this field of law.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
Star ratings
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
Holdings
Item type Current library Call number Status Date due Barcode
e-Books e-Books Bangalore University Library
Available BUSP006452

The development of judicial review of administrative action -- Judicial review of discretionary powers -- Procedural errors in the administrative procedure -- Governmental liability -- Tradition and change.

Administrative legal systems are based on national constitutional legal traditions and cultural values. English judges have for centuries applied the common law. In Germany, judges have developed administrative legal principles for the protection of the individual against state action. However, over the last few decades’ Administrative legal systems have become less isolated. This is the result of fundamental developments in the European legal landscape and of the increasing complexity of Administrative legal problems. In the UK, the constitutional basis for judicial review, principles of judicial control and governmental liability as well as the organisation of the courts are changing. Both, the English and the German Administrative legal systems are increasingly faced with the question of how to balance the dynamics of change with the preserving forces of tradition. Here, the open attitude of judges and lawmakers in considering solutions offered elsewhere is a remarkable development in a field of law which has long been perceived as too nationally specific. There is a growing need for comparative material and analysis in Administrative law - this book provides a valuable contribution to this field of law.

There are no comments on this title.

to post a comment.

Powered by Koha